Rare Disease · Germany · In-Market

DE PNH Market Sizing Model

Germany's DGHO Onkopedia guideline states plainly that Germany-specific PNH prevalence and incidence figures do not exist. It borrows 16 cases and 1.3 new diagnoses per million annually from British and French registries, and routes all case-finding through just two national centres, Ulm and Essen.

5-sheet modelBorrowed-rate vs. institutional-funnel triangulationIn-MarketUpdated Q3 2026
Market United States United Kingdom Germany France GCC (Gulf) Stage
The Landscape

Germany has no domestic PNH prevalence figure. The DGHO Onkopedia guideline borrows 16 cases per million from British and French registries, and every German diagnosis runs through just two national centres, Ulm and Essen, making the absence of an independent count, not a disputed number, the central sizing finding.

Germany's PNH epidemiology is entirely derivative. The DGHO's Onkopedia clinical guideline states plainly that Germany-specific prevalence and incidence figures do not exist, and borrows an estimated 16 cases per million and 1.3 new diagnoses per million annually from British and French registries instead. No AXLRx source computes an absolute German patient total from that rate, and none should be invented here: multiplying a borrowed per-million figure by Germany's population would manufacture a precision the underlying data does not support. The rate itself, not a derived headcount, is the only sizing input Germany's own clinical literature currently offers.

The second input is structural rather than numeric: German PNH diagnosis and referral run through just two national centres, the German PNH-Register at the Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics in Ulm, and the West German Cancer Center at University Hospital Essen, both of which feed the International PNH Registry. This two-centre concentration is a narrower institutional funnel than markets with broader registry infrastructure, and it means Germany's undiagnosed pool, real by definition given the borrowed prevalence rate, has never been quantified. A separate commercial pressure compounds the sizing question: six months after Germany's G-BA granted iptacopan a substantial-benefit finding under the orphan-drug pathway (19 December 2024), its Lauer-Taxe list price remained unpublished, the kind of pricing uncertainty that makes an unreconciled patient count harder, not easier, to act on. Our sensitivity analysis ranks the absence of an independent German epidemiological source, ahead of the borrowed rate's precision, as the single assumption most likely to move any sized total.

16 per million
borrowed PNH prevalence estimate used in Germany's DGHO Onkopedia guideline, sourced from British and French registries
1.3 per million
borrowed annual incidence estimate of new PNH diagnoses, same borrowed-registry basis
2
national referral centres, Ulm and Essen, through which all German PNH case-finding is concentrated
€0
published Lauer-Taxe list price for iptacopan more than six months after Germany's 19 December 2024 G-BA benefit decision
TRIANGULATION

Germany PNH sizing — a borrowed epidemiological rate versus a two-centre institutional funnel

Sizing InputValueWhat It Captures
Borrowed prevalence rate (DGHO Onkopedia)16 cases per million; 1.3 new diagnoses per million annuallyBritish- and French-registry-derived rate; no Germany-specific source exists
Institutional referral structure2 national centres: German PNH-Register (Ulm); West German Cancer Center (Essen)Both feed the International PNH Registry; concentrated, narrower case-finding funnel
Pricing/reimbursement signal€0 published Lauer-Taxe price for iptacopan, >6 months post-G-BA decision (19 Dec 2024)G-BA substantial-benefit finding under the orphan-drug pathway, §35a Abs.1 S.11 SGB V
Estimated undiagnosed poolNot yet quantifiedStructural implication of a borrowed rate with no domestic case count to confirm it

Sources: DGHO Onkopedia PNH clinical guideline; German PNH-Register (Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm); West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen; G-BA Nutzenbewertungsverfahren Iptacopan (Beschluss 19.12.2024); GKV-Spitzenverband §130b SGB V negotiation registry.

Commercial Questions

What this model answers

Every section answers a named commercial question your team is asking, scoped to your asset.

01
Why does Germany have no independent PNH prevalence figure, and is the borrowed 16-per-million DGHO Onkopedia rate a safe sizing input?

Delivers

  • The DGHO Onkopedia guideline's explicit statement that Germany-specific figures do not exist
  • the British/French registry basis of the borrowed rate
  • why AXLRx does not convert that rate into an unverified absolute headcount
02
How does Germany's two-centre referral concentration (Ulm and Essen) affect confidence in any German patient count?

Delivers

  • The German PNH-Register (Ulm) and West German Cancer Center (Essen) referral structure
  • why this is a narrower institutional funnel than markets with broader registry infrastructure
  • the undiagnosed-pool implication
03
Does the unpublished Lauer-Taxe price for iptacopan, six months after its G-BA benefit decision, change how a commercial team should read the addressable German population?

Delivers

  • The 19 December 2024 G-BA substantial-benefit finding and its orphan-pathway basis
  • the still-unpublished list price
  • the sizing and launch-planning consequence of pricing uncertainty layered on an unreconciled patient count

Custom model delivered in 72 hours.

Commission This Model
Contents

What's inside

Rare Disease · 24–32 pp · In-Market · Analyst report + Excel model + PowerPoint readout

1 The Binding Constraint 2 pp
  • Why the absence of an independent German epidemiological source, not the borrowed prevalence rate itself, is the assumption most likely to move a sized total
  • Pressure-tested against the two-centre (Ulm/Essen) referral concentration before the rest of the model is built out
2 Borrowed-Rate Sizing — DGHO Onkopedia 3 pp
  • The 16-per-million prevalence and 1.3-per-million incidence estimates, borrowed from British and French registries
  • Why AXLRx does not convert this rate into an unverified absolute German headcount
3 Institutional Referral Sizing — Ulm and Essen 3 pp
  • The German PNH-Register (Ulm) and West German Cancer Center (Essen) as the only two national referral centres
  • The two-centre concentration as a narrower institutional funnel than broader-registry markets
4 Triangulation & the Undiagnosed Pool 3 pp
  • Why a borrowed rate and a two-centre referral structure cannot yet be reconciled into a confirmed German patient count
  • The unquantified undiagnosed pool this leaves for any therapy launching without a domestic count
5 Sensitivity Analysis 3 pp
  • Absence of independent German epidemiology ranked above the borrowed rate's precision as the binding assumption
  • Scenario ranges tied to the unpublished iptacopan Lauer-Taxe price and G-BA orphan-pathway precedent
6 Editable Excel Model
  • The full triangulated model, re-runnable with your own assumptions
7 Client Alignment Questions 2 pp
  • The open sizing questions your team must close before the number is used in planning
Appendix and source ledger included · 45-minute analyst readout included with delivery
Formats

Included with every brief

PDF
PDF Brief
Market Sizing Brief — Complete Edition
PDF methodology brief accompanying the 5-sheet sizing model: borrowed-rate and institutional-funnel triangulation for PNH Germany.
XLS
Excel Model
Market Sizing Model — Excel
5-sheet editable model: Cover, Model, Research Validation, QC, Sensitivity.
Methodology

How AXLRx builds this model

Prepared by MoatRx analysts.

Every AXLRx market sizing model triangulates at least two independent methods before accepting a patient count. This is explicitly a sizing model (static patient count), distinct from a Patient Flow or forecasting model (dynamic revenue/uptake).

PNH Germany sizing sources: the DGHO Onkopedia PNH clinical guideline, the German PNH-Register at Ulm's Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, the West German Cancer Center at University Hospital Essen, and the G-BA Nutzenbewertungsverfahren for iptacopan (Beschluss 19 December 2024).

  • Borrowed 16-per-million prevalence and 1.3-per-million incidence rates verified against the DGHO Onkopedia PNH clinical guideline
  • Two-centre referral structure verified against the German PNH-Register (Ulm) and West German Cancer Center (Essen) listings
  • Iptacopan G-BA benefit decision and unpublished Lauer-Taxe status verified against the G-BA Nutzenbewertungsverfahren and GKV-Spitzenverband §130b SGB V negotiation registry
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Deliverables
What formats are included with every model?
Every commissioned Market Sizing Model includes an editable 5-sheet Excel model (Cover, Model, Research Validation, QC, Sensitivity) and a PDF methodology brief, no PowerPoint deck, since a sizing model is built to be worked in directly, not presented from. An optional 45-minute analyst readout call is included.
Sources
How is the patient count verified?
AXLRx triangulates every sizing estimate across independent methods, and states plainly when no independent domestic source exists, as is the case for Germany's borrowed DGHO Onkopedia prevalence rate, rather than manufacturing a false headcount.
Customisation
Can I size a specific market or subpopulation?
Yes. The intake form captures your indication, target market, and cohort definition. A scoping call confirms scope before research starts. Commission via the intake form to start.
Get Started

Commission this model

AXLRx delivers rare disease market sizing models built for forecasting and strategy teams sizing the Germany PNH opportunity. Custom model in 72 hours.

1
Submit your request

Specify your indication, market, and cohort definition.

2
Scoping call

AXLRx analyst confirms triangulation methods and comparator set before building.

3
Delivery

Research-verified sizing model in 72 hours with optional analyst readout.