Germany has no domestic PNH prevalence figure. The DGHO Onkopedia guideline borrows 16 cases per million from British and French registries, and every German diagnosis runs through just two national centres, Ulm and Essen, making the absence of an independent count, not a disputed number, the central sizing finding.
Germany's PNH epidemiology is entirely derivative. The DGHO's Onkopedia clinical guideline states plainly that Germany-specific prevalence and incidence figures do not exist, and borrows an estimated 16 cases per million and 1.3 new diagnoses per million annually from British and French registries instead. No AXLRx source computes an absolute German patient total from that rate, and none should be invented here: multiplying a borrowed per-million figure by Germany's population would manufacture a precision the underlying data does not support. The rate itself, not a derived headcount, is the only sizing input Germany's own clinical literature currently offers.
The second input is structural rather than numeric: German PNH diagnosis and referral run through just two national centres, the German PNH-Register at the Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics in Ulm, and the West German Cancer Center at University Hospital Essen, both of which feed the International PNH Registry. This two-centre concentration is a narrower institutional funnel than markets with broader registry infrastructure, and it means Germany's undiagnosed pool, real by definition given the borrowed prevalence rate, has never been quantified. A separate commercial pressure compounds the sizing question: six months after Germany's G-BA granted iptacopan a substantial-benefit finding under the orphan-drug pathway (19 December 2024), its Lauer-Taxe list price remained unpublished, the kind of pricing uncertainty that makes an unreconciled patient count harder, not easier, to act on. Our sensitivity analysis ranks the absence of an independent German epidemiological source, ahead of the borrowed rate's precision, as the single assumption most likely to move any sized total.
Germany PNH sizing — a borrowed epidemiological rate versus a two-centre institutional funnel
| Sizing Input | Value | What It Captures |
|---|---|---|
| Borrowed prevalence rate (DGHO Onkopedia) | 16 cases per million; 1.3 new diagnoses per million annually | British- and French-registry-derived rate; no Germany-specific source exists |
| Institutional referral structure | 2 national centres: German PNH-Register (Ulm); West German Cancer Center (Essen) | Both feed the International PNH Registry; concentrated, narrower case-finding funnel |
| Pricing/reimbursement signal | €0 published Lauer-Taxe price for iptacopan, >6 months post-G-BA decision (19 Dec 2024) | G-BA substantial-benefit finding under the orphan-drug pathway, §35a Abs.1 S.11 SGB V |
| Estimated undiagnosed pool | Not yet quantified | Structural implication of a borrowed rate with no domestic case count to confirm it |
Sources: DGHO Onkopedia PNH clinical guideline; German PNH-Register (Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm); West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen; G-BA Nutzenbewertungsverfahren Iptacopan (Beschluss 19.12.2024); GKV-Spitzenverband §130b SGB V negotiation registry.
What this model answers
Every section answers a named commercial question your team is asking, scoped to your asset.
Delivers
- The DGHO Onkopedia guideline's explicit statement that Germany-specific figures do not exist
- the British/French registry basis of the borrowed rate
- why AXLRx does not convert that rate into an unverified absolute headcount
Delivers
- The German PNH-Register (Ulm) and West German Cancer Center (Essen) referral structure
- why this is a narrower institutional funnel than markets with broader registry infrastructure
- the undiagnosed-pool implication
Delivers
- The 19 December 2024 G-BA substantial-benefit finding and its orphan-pathway basis
- the still-unpublished list price
- the sizing and launch-planning consequence of pricing uncertainty layered on an unreconciled patient count
Custom model delivered in 72 hours.
Commission This ModelWhat's inside
- Why the absence of an independent German epidemiological source, not the borrowed prevalence rate itself, is the assumption most likely to move a sized total
- Pressure-tested against the two-centre (Ulm/Essen) referral concentration before the rest of the model is built out
- The 16-per-million prevalence and 1.3-per-million incidence estimates, borrowed from British and French registries
- Why AXLRx does not convert this rate into an unverified absolute German headcount
- The German PNH-Register (Ulm) and West German Cancer Center (Essen) as the only two national referral centres
- The two-centre concentration as a narrower institutional funnel than broader-registry markets
- Why a borrowed rate and a two-centre referral structure cannot yet be reconciled into a confirmed German patient count
- The unquantified undiagnosed pool this leaves for any therapy launching without a domestic count
- Absence of independent German epidemiology ranked above the borrowed rate's precision as the binding assumption
- Scenario ranges tied to the unpublished iptacopan Lauer-Taxe price and G-BA orphan-pathway precedent
- The full triangulated model, re-runnable with your own assumptions
- The open sizing questions your team must close before the number is used in planning
Included with every brief
How AXLRx builds this model
Prepared by MoatRx analysts.
Every AXLRx market sizing model triangulates at least two independent methods before accepting a patient count. This is explicitly a sizing model (static patient count), distinct from a Patient Flow or forecasting model (dynamic revenue/uptake).
PNH Germany sizing sources: the DGHO Onkopedia PNH clinical guideline, the German PNH-Register at Ulm's Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, the West German Cancer Center at University Hospital Essen, and the G-BA Nutzenbewertungsverfahren for iptacopan (Beschluss 19 December 2024).
- Borrowed 16-per-million prevalence and 1.3-per-million incidence rates verified against the DGHO Onkopedia PNH clinical guideline
- Two-centre referral structure verified against the German PNH-Register (Ulm) and West German Cancer Center (Essen) listings
- Iptacopan G-BA benefit decision and unpublished Lauer-Taxe status verified against the G-BA Nutzenbewertungsverfahren and GKV-Spitzenverband §130b SGB V negotiation registry
Frequently asked questions
Commission this model
AXLRx delivers rare disease market sizing models built for forecasting and strategy teams sizing the Germany PNH opportunity. Custom model in 72 hours.
Specify your indication, market, and cohort definition.
AXLRx analyst confirms triangulation methods and comparator set before building.
Research-verified sizing model in 72 hours with optional analyst readout.