Rare Disease · United Kingdom · In-Market

UK Hereditary Angioedema Payer & HTA

NICE TA606 commissioned lanadelumab with PAS and 87.5% real-world attack reduction — berotralstat's NICE TA738 recommendation is now tested against that same benchmark.

NICE TA606 — 87.5% real-world attack reductionNHS lanadelumab spend ~£27M/year40 HAE specialist centresUpdated Q3 2026
Market United States United Kingdom GCC (Gulf) Stage
The Landscape

NICE TA606 lanadelumab is delivering real-world outcomes that match its trial data — the benchmark berotralstat's NICE TA738 recommendation must sustain under its stop-rule review.

NICE TA606 (2019) recommended lanadelumab (Takhzyro, Takeda) for adults with three or more attacks per 12 months, with a confidential Patient Access Scheme bringing net NHS cost to an estimated £180,000–£200,000 a year. NHS commissioning runs through 40 HAE specialist centres, and real-world evidence from the UK HAE Alliance (2022–2023 survey) confirms an 87.5% reduction in mean attacks per year (from 12 before lanadelumab to 1.5 after), closely matching the HELP trial, alongside a fall in emergency attendance from 45% to 5% of patients per year. NICE's original cost-effectiveness model held within the standard £20,000–£30,000/QALY threshold with PAS, and TA606 is regarded within NHS commissioning as a rare-disease access success.

Berotralstat (Orladeyo, BioCryst) has carried a NICE recommendation since TA738 (20 October 2021), for adults with two or more attacks a month, subject to a mandatory three-month stop rule under which treatment continues only if response is demonstrated. It has been NHS-available for several years, well past the Named Patient Programme that preceded its appraisal. Its oral dosing offers a real convenience advantage over lanadelumab's four-weekly subcutaneous injection, though the two agents' evidence bases are not directly comparable: the APeX-2 trial showed a 44% attack-rate reduction versus placebo, against lanadelumab's real-world 87.5% reduction confirmed by the UK HAE Alliance. NICE's positive recommendation reflects a confidential commercial arrangement alongside the stop-rule safeguard, with the NHS acute-therapy cost offset (C1 inhibitor and icatibant rescue costs of £30,000–£80,000 a year in inadequately prophylaxed patients) forming part of the ongoing economic case for both agents.

87.5%
Real-world attack-rate reduction on lanadelumab confirmed by the UK HAE Alliance survey (2022–2023), matching the HELP trial
£27M
Estimated annual NHS lanadelumab spend across ~1,500 UK patients at post-PAS net cost
TA738
NICE recommendation (Oct 2021) for berotralstat in adults with ≥2 attacks/month, subject to a mandatory 3-month stop rule
PAYER LANDSCAPE

UK HAE agent NICE and NHS status

Drug (Brand / INN)NICE HTA RouteNICE Recommendation & PASNHS Commissioning ChannelReal-World / Trial EvidenceKey Payer Risk
Takhzyro (lanadelumab)Standard Technology Appraisal (TA606, 2019)Recommended with confidential PASNHS — 40 HAE specialist centresUK HAE Alliance 2022–2023: 87.5% attack reduction; ER attendance 45%→5%Dominant prophylaxis; berotralstat entry pressure on share, not price
Orladeyo (berotralstat)Standard Technology Appraisal (TA738, 2021)Recommended with confidential PAS; 3-month stop ruleNHS — accessible via HAE specialist centresAPeX-2: 44% attack reduction vs placebo — not directly comparable to lanadelumabOral convenience vs lanadelumab; stop-rule continuation risk for non-responders

Sources: NICE TA606 Final Appraisal Determination (lanadelumab), 2019; UK HAE Alliance real-world outcomes survey, 2023; NICE TA738 Final Appraisal Determination (berotralstat), 2021; NHS BNF pricing and NHS England HAE commissioning cost data.

Commercial Questions

What this assessment answers

Every section answers a named commercial question your team is asking, scoped to your asset.

01
How has NICE TA606 lanadelumab performed against its trial data in real-world NHS use, and how does that compare to berotralstat's NICE TA738 recommendation?

Delivers

  • TA606 real-world evidence analysis (87.5% attack reduction, ER attendance fall from 45% to 5%)
  • confidential PAS structure
  • the comparator standard berotralstat's TA738 recommendation was measured against
02
What did berotralstat's NICE TA738 recommendation require, and how does its 3-month stop rule manage ongoing cost-effectiveness risk?

Delivers

  • NICE's indirect treatment comparison methodology behind TA738
  • stop-rule mechanics and continuation criteria
  • oral-vs-SC utility trade-off as assessed by NICE
03
What is the NHS economic case for HAE prophylaxis versus acute therapy costs, and how does it support NICE's cost-effectiveness modelling for both agents?

Delivers

  • NHS acute therapy cost benchmarking (Berinert, Firazyr) against prophylaxis net cost
  • cost-offset modelling used in NICE TA606 and TA738's recommendations
  • implications for future HAE submissions

Custom assessment delivered in 72 hours.

Commission This Assessment
Contents

What's inside

Rare Disease · 24–32 pp · In-Market · Analyst report + Excel model + PowerPoint readout

1 UK HAE Payer & Commissioning Landscape — NHS Specialist Centre Overview 4 pp
  • How NHS commissioning runs through 40 HAE specialist centres, delivering an estimated £27M annual lanadelumab spend across roughly 1,500 UK patients.
  • Why TA606 is regarded within NHS commissioning as a rare-disease access success, holding within the standard £20,000 to £30,000 per QALY threshold under a confidential Patient Access Scheme.
2 NICE TA606 Lanadelumab — Real-World Outcomes vs Trial Data 6 pp
  • How UK HAE Alliance real-world data from 2022 to 2023 confirms an 87.5% reduction in mean attacks per year, from 12 before lanadelumab to 1.5 after, closely matching the HELP trial.
  • Why emergency attendance fell from 45% to 5% of patients a year, reinforcing the case for the £180,000 to £200,000 confidential PAS net cost.
3 Berotralstat NICE TA738 — Recommendation Criteria & Stop-Rule Mechanics 6 pp
  • What TA738, dated 20 October 2021, requires: adults with 2 or more attacks a month, subject to a mandatory 3-month stop rule tied to demonstrated response.
  • How the APeX-2 trial's 44% attack-rate reduction versus placebo compares, though not directly, against lanadelumab's real-world 87.5% reduction.
4 NHS Acute Therapy Cost Offset — Berinert, Firazyr & the Prophylaxis Economic Case 4 pp
  • Why C1 inhibitor and icatibant rescue costs of £30,000 to £80,000 a year in inadequately prophylaxed patients underpin the ongoing economic case for prophylaxis.
  • How NHS acute-therapy cost offset modelling supported NICE's cost-effectiveness case for both lanadelumab's TA606 and berotralstat's TA738.
5 NHS HAE Specialist Centre Network & Access Pathway 3 pp
  • How NHS-commissioned access to lanadelumab and berotralstat runs through the national network of 40 HAE specialist centres.
  • Why berotralstat's oral dosing offers a convenience advantage over lanadelumab's four-weekly subcutaneous injection within that same access pathway.
6 Devolved Nations — Scotland (SMC) and Wales (AWMSG) Divergence Risk 3 pp
  • How Scotland's SMC and Wales's AWMSG positions on lanadelumab and berotralstat are assessed separately against NICE's TA606 precedent.
  • Why devolved-nation divergence risk matters given the confidential PAS commercial arrangements underpinning both TA606 and TA738.
Appendix and source ledger included · 45-minute analyst readout included with delivery
Formats

Included with every brief

PDF
PDF Brief
HAE Payer & HTA Assessment — UK Complete Edition
25–30 page payer brief: NICE TA606 real-world outcomes, berotralstat's NICE TA738 recommendation, and NHS acute-therapy cost-offset modelling.
XLS
Excel Model
Payer Coverage Grid — Excel
Drug-by-drug NICE HTA status, PAS discount estimates, NHS commissioning channel, and real-world outcomes for UK HAE agents in editable Excel format.
PPT
PowerPoint
Executive Readout — PowerPoint
12–15 slide readout deck for commercial team presentations, formatted to AXLRx design standards.
Methodology

How AXLRx builds this assessment

Prepared by MoatRx analysts.

This assessment is built from NICE's published Technology Appraisal documentation, UK HAE Alliance real-world outcomes data, and NHS commissioning cost benchmarks for prophylaxis and acute HAE therapy.

Key sources: NICE TA606 Final Appraisal Determination (lanadelumab), 2019; UK HAE Alliance real-world survey, 2022–2023; NICE TA738 Final Appraisal Determination (berotralstat), 2021; NHS BNF acute-therapy pricing; NHS England HAE commissioning cost data. Devolved-nation positions (Scotland's SMC, Wales's AWMSG) are assessed separately against NICE's TA606 precedent.

  • NICE TA606 recommendation and PAS status verified against the NICE TA606 Final Appraisal Determination, 2019
  • Real-world attack-reduction and ER-attendance figures verified against the UK HAE Alliance real-world outcomes survey, 2022–2023
  • Berotralstat's NICE recommendation verified against the NICE TA738 Final Appraisal Determination, 2021
  • NHS acute-therapy cost benchmarks verified against NHS BNF pricing and NHS England HAE commissioning cost data
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Deliverables
What formats are included with every assessment?
Every commissioned assessment includes three deliverables: a 20–30 page PDF analyst assessment with verified sources and exhibit tables, an editable Excel model (drug comparison grid, payer formulary data, or patient flow model — depending on deliverable type), and a 10–15 slide PowerPoint readout deck formatted for commercial team presentations. An optional 60-minute analyst readout call is included with all deliveries.
Sources
What sources does AXLRx use, and how are findings verified?
AXLRx builds from primary sources only — regulatory databases (FDA, MHRA, SFDA), peer-reviewed journals (NEJM, Blood, JAMA), live payer and HTA body publications (NICE, ICER, MOH), and NHS commissioning documentation. No secondary summaries or market research reports. Every factual claim is independently verified before inclusion. Source citations are provided for all key data points in the delivered assessment.
Customisation
Can I tailor the assessment to my specific question, geography, or comparator set?
Yes. The intake form captures your indication, target geography, key comparator drugs, and the specific commercial question you need answered. A scoping call confirms scope before research starts. Custom extensions such as additional payer markets, pipeline agent profiles, or country-specific deep-dives can be added to any standard assessment. Commission via the intake form to start.
Get Started

Commission this assessment

AXLRx HAE Payer & HTA is built for market access, HEOR, and pricing teams navigating NICE TA606's real-world outcomes and berotralstat's NICE TA738 recommendation in the UK HAE market. Custom assessment in 72 hours.

1
Submit your request

Specify indication, payer focus (NICE TA, PAS, NHS commissioning), and commercial question.

2
Scoping call

AXLRx analyst confirms payer scope, NICE appraisal analysis, and delivery format.

3
Delivery

Research-verified assessment in 72 hours with optional analyst readout.