Fintepla's weight-based list price runs roughly 3x Epidiolex, and that gap, not a formal HTA verdict, is what payers work through step-edit design and Part D routing.
Dravet-specific pricing in the US sits on a generic valproate/clobazam backbone and three branded agents. Cannabidiol (Epidiolex, Jazz Pharmaceuticals) lists near $32,000 a year and has held a six-year branded run since 2018 with no generic entrant; ANDA litigation is settled to launch dates in the late 2030s. Fenfluramine (Fintepla, UCB) lists at a weight-based average near $96,000 a year, roughly three times cannabidiol, reflecting its stronger pivotal-trial efficacy and its REMS cardiac-monitoring burden. Stiripentol (Diacomit, Biocodex) sits well below both at roughly $10,000 to $15,000 a year, priced as an adjunct-only therapy rather than a monotherapy competitor.
Neither cannabidiol nor fenfluramine is a controlled substance today. The DEA descheduled Epidiolex in 2020 and fenfluramine in 2022, so both route through the standard Part D pharmacy benefit rather than a specialty narcotics pathway. Prior-authorization criteria are already fixed across payers: a Dravet diagnosis (clinical or SCN1A-confirmed), at least four seizures a month, and documented failure of two or more prior anti-seizure medications. Many commercial plans layer a step-edit on top, requiring a cannabidiol trial before fenfluramine is authorized, despite fenfluramine's stronger pivotal result, precisely because the three-fold price gap is the variable payers can act on. The payer mix, roughly half commercial and 45% Medicaid, means a state Medicaid strategy has to exist at launch, not after.
US Dravet pricing — the branded class against the generic backbone
| Agent | Mechanism | Annual WAC | Payer Positioning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidiolex (cannabidiol) | Oral CBD | ~$32,000/yr | Lower-cost branded option; step-edit gate before fenfluramine; no generic until the late 2030s |
| Fintepla (fenfluramine) | Serotonin-releasing agent; REMS | ~$96,000/yr (weight-based) | ~3x Epidiolex; REMS adds PA documentation burden |
| Diacomit (stiripentol) | GABA-A modulator, adjunct-only | ~$10,000-15,000/yr | Adjunct-only; caps the class's comparator pricing floor |
Sources: UCB/Zogenix Fintepla pricing disclosures 2020; Jazz Pharmaceuticals Epidiolex pricing disclosures; DEA descheduling notices (Epidiolex 2020, fenfluramine 2022); FDA Drugs@FDA.
What this model answers
Every section answers a named commercial question your team is asking, scoped to your asset.
Delivers
- Fintepla vs Epidiolex WAC comparison
- step-edit criteria already in force
- the efficacy-versus-cost trade payers are resolving
Delivers
- DEA descheduling timeline (Epidiolex 2020, fenfluramine 2022)
- Part D pharmacy-benefit mechanics
- specialty-pharmacy channel implications
Delivers
- ANDA litigation settlement timeline
- stiripentol's $10K-15K adjunct-only price anchor
- pricing-ladder placement for a new agent
Custom model delivered in 72 hours.
Commission This ModelWhat's inside
- Why the Fintepla-Epidiolex list-price gap, not a single HTA verdict, sets the US Dravet pricing ladder
- Pressure-tested against Part D routing and step-edit precedent before the rest of the model is built out
- Fintepla, Epidiolex, and Diacomit WAC positioned against the generic valproate/clobazam backbone
- Where the roughly 3x price gap sits inside the class
- Why neither branded agent is a controlled substance today
- What DEA descheduling (2020, 2022) means for benefit design and specialty-pharmacy access
- The fixed PA criteria: seizure frequency, ASM-failure count, specialist sign-off
- How the price gap drives cannabidiol-before-fenfluramine step-edit logic
- Why no generic cannabidiol reaches market before the late 2030s
- What that decade-long window means for pricing strategy
- The list-price, rebate, and net-price components decomposed by agent
- Medicaid best-price and rebate implications for a roughly 45% payer-mix population
- Pricing scenarios bounded by the Diacomit floor and Fintepla ceiling
- Conservative, base, and aggressive revenue cases tied to Medicaid access timing
- The open pricing questions your team must close before a US launch price is locked
- Structured for an internal pricing committee session
Included with every brief
How AXLRx builds this model
Prepared by MoatRx analysts.
Every AXLRx pricing model is built from primary regulatory and manufacturer-disclosure sources, not secondary summaries. Findings are independently verified before inclusion.
US Dravet syndrome pricing sources: UCB/Zogenix and Jazz Pharmaceuticals list-price disclosures, the Fintepla FDA label and REMS requirement, DEA descheduling notices, and FDA Drugs@FDA registration records.
- Fintepla and Epidiolex list pricing verified against UCB/Zogenix and Jazz Pharmaceuticals disclosures
- Controlled-substance status verified against DEA notices, Epidiolex descheduled 2020, fenfluramine descheduled 2022
- Medicaid payer-mix share and PA criteria verified against Dravet Syndrome Foundation census data and current commercial plan PA policy language
Frequently asked questions
Commission this model
AXLRx delivers Dravet syndrome pricing strategy models built for market access and pricing teams navigating the US step-edit and Part D pricing dynamics. Custom model in 72 hours.
Specify your indication, payer segment, and comparator scope.
AXLRx analyst confirms pricing mechanism assumptions and WTP threshold before building.
Research-verified pricing model in 72 hours with optional analyst readout.